The Convention of States Movement

fighting-terror-constitution convention states movementThe movement to organize a Convention of States is gathering much steam of late and has become quite a hotly-debated topic.  Why?

Both supporters and opponents of such a convention (CoS) want to take action to bring power back to the states and to the American people – where the Constitution states it belongs – rather than in Washington DC. Both groups believe our federal government has abused and stretched the powers enumerated to it by the U.S. Constitution. They assert that both elected and unelected Washington bureaucrats should not be allowed to make sweeping unfettered decisions which can have major impact on millions of citizens.

Article V of the U.S. Constitution gives states the power to call a Convention of States to propose amendments. It requires 34 states to call the convention and 38 states to ratify any proposed amendments. The objective is to discuss amendments that would limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal government, impose fiscal restraint and pass term limits on Federal officials.

A CoS, however, is NOT the only way the U.S. Constitution might be altered. The alternative method, and likely the least risky, is that Congress might propose amendments, which could be passed with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This method has strong precedent. Of the 33 amendments approved by Congress and sent along to the states for ratification, only 27 were in fact ratified, and went on to become addenda to the U.S. Constitution.

Convention proponents claim they can limit a convention to just one subject (or a few pre-ordained subjects), but most legal scholars disagree. Because the Constitution is vague on how such a convention would actually work, many believe the gathering could leave Americans a wholesale rewrite of the Constitution – endangering fundamental rights like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to trial by jury. The convention could even elect to abolish our original Constitution altogether.

What are the arguments put forth in favor of, and opposed to, calling a new Convention of States?


Those who support a Convention of States argue that numerous safeguards inherent in Article V would protect the gathering from deteriorating into a runaway convention. They view the strongest safeguard as the ratification process for Convention-proposed amendments – which is the same one that amendments proposed by Congress would go through. If ratification by 38 states would be required for a new amendment to pass – that means only 13 states voting ‘NO’ could block it.

Article V CoS supporters have petitions in all fifty state house districts across America – and are actively working to move their project forward. Here is what some supporters say:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott: “The Founders of the United States of America inserted Article V into the Constitution because they knew the entrenched powers in Washington would thumb their noses at the states and try to hijack the system for themselves. That’s why we need a Convention of States, authorized in the Constitution, to propose amendments to fix America.”

President of the conservative Leadership Institute, Morton Blackwell: “Some constitutional changes must be made. Nothing less will remove the danger that a future, solidly leftist, Supreme Court would ‘interpret’ the Constitution to eliminate the separation of powers and checks and balances in government. The great American experiment with limited government would be over.”

When asked if he supported the idea of a CoS, U.S. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, Hon. Ben Carson, MD, replied: “Very much so… our Founding Fathers knew there would probably come a time when you would need to make some adjustments to the Constitution.”

Florida Rep. Ron De Santis: “I’ve spent years fighting the DC Swamp, and as a candidate for Governor of Florida, I know the states need Article V to take the power away from DC. The permanent bureaucracy will never voluntarily give up an ounce of its power.”

Constitutional lawyer and CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, Michael Farris: “Only a Convention of States will give us effective solutions to the abuse of power in Washington DC. It is our moral obligation to protect liberty for ourselves and our posterity.”

U.S. Army Major and FOX News contributor, Pete Hegseth: “The leviathan that is today’s federal government continues to grow unabated, pushing the people farther away from our Founder’s vision of self-governance. The Convention of States Project is the only constitutional pathway for citizens to save our Republic by restoring it to its citizens.”

Former Arkansas Governor, Rev. Mike Huckabee: “My longtime friend, Michael Farris — who is an excellent litigator and professor – has joined with Mark Meckler and Citizens for Self-Governance, to actually bring [a Convention of States] into reality. I have reviewed their plan, and it is both innovative and realistic. I urge you to join me in Supporting the Convention of States Project with Citizens for Self-Governance.”

Former Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal: “Luckily the Founders gave us a mechanism to reform a runaway federal government in Article V of the Constitution. We can – and we must – scale back the monstrosity our federal government has become.”

Attorney and broadcast patriot, Mark Levin: “I have whole-heartedly endorsed the Convention of States Project. I serve on its Legal Board of Reference because they propose a solution as big as the problem. They are promoting state applications for a convention for the purpose of limiting the scope, power and jurisdiction of the federal government – and that’s what needs to be done.”

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida: “I put my trust in the people, not Washington, in the critical effort to restore constitutional limited government. The Convention of States Project is a genuine grassroots movement to achieve that goal, and one I am proud to be a part of.”

Former Florida Congressman, Lt. Col. Allen West: “Thank goodness the Founders had the wisdom to provide us with Article V of the Constitution, which gives us the right and power to hold an Amending Convention, for the purpose of proposing amendments to restrain scope and power of the federal government. Under the system of federalism, I support the efforts to gather a Constitutional Convention of States – consistent with Article V and honoring the Tenth Amendment.”

Among other respected CoS supporters are: former Florida governor Jeb Bush, former Senator from Oklahoma Tom Coburn, historian David Barton, former Senator from South Carolina Jim DeMint, Sheriff David Clarke, Lt.Col. Bill Cowan (USMC Ret.), Attorney Andrew McCarthy, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, former Missouri Senator Jim Talent, Hon. Ken Cuccinelli, former Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin, Rep. Jeff Duncan and economist Thomas Sowell.


Perceived dangers inherent in an Article V convention have generated vocal bipartisan opposition and fear of a runaway convention. In fact, historical precedent exists from the very beginning of our country for a CoS to exceed its stated boundaries.

Delegates to the original 1787 Philadelphia Convention exceeded their mandates to revise the then-governing Articles of Confederation. While this fortunately led to our present U.S. Constitution, it could have led anywhere.

The case against the CoS movement was bolstered by warnings from, among others, the late, ultra-conservative Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia, who declared: “Whoa! Who knows what would come out of it!”

How could a Convention of States go wrong? The Convention could propose bad amendments or a completely new, socialist or progressive U.S. Constitution, and then force its passage by introducing and utilizing a new ratification process, rather than the 38 states currently required.

As an alternative, Article VI could be invoked. In Article VI, America’s Founders provided the power to counter constitutional violations with law enforcement and punishment. Therefore, if an Article V CoS were convened and went awry, local, state and federal officials who swore an oath to the U.S. Constitution could exercise their duty to protect citizens’ rights by opposing and enforcing any flagrant Constitutional violations or unauthorized changes. The downside could, of course, result in a full-scale revolution with violence and bloodshed.

Under Article VI, many powers assumed today by the federal government, which are not specifically enumerated by the U.S. Constitution, could be changed. For example, taxes could be dramatically reduced and much of the corruption and abuses of power in Washington DC could be curbed.

Conservative political journalist Kelleigh Nelson wrote in March 2018: “Countless authorities have stated that a CoS cannot be controlled. Once opened, the entire [Constitutional] document can be taken down and changed. There are no statesmen today like our founders, and the risk of opening a convention for any reason would result in the destruction of the last threads binding us to a representative Republic.”

Constitutional attorney and activist, Publius Huldah, demands every U.S. citizen read the U.S. Constitution, understand its list of enumerated powers reserved for the federal government, and vote only for those who vow to stay true to their Constitutional oath — to govern according to our supreme document.

Another important caveat: It may seem counterintuitive, but many liberal and progressive Democrats strongly seek an Article V Convention as an opportunity to make their own changes.

Among the major changes they seek are to have publicly funded elections, abolition of the Electoral College, revamping of the Senate to more strongly represent urban populations, and repeal of the Second Amendment. They would also create term limits for Supreme Court Justices and create for all a basic right to free healthcare, education, housing and the vote, as well as a basic annual income for all (workers and non-workers alike).

The far-left policy group Common Causefunded by socialist billionaire George Soros – and its affiliates, declared war against a CoS movement, calling it the largest radical alliance in U.S. history. These groups are dedicated to Marxism, fascism, radical environmentalism and abortion-on-demand. A few affiliates include the AFL-CIO, the Center for American Progress, Democracy 21, Greenpeace USA, Mi Familia Vota, MoveOn.org, the NAACP, the National Council of La Raza, the Action Fund, Planned Parenthood, People of the American Way, the Sierra Club and the SEIU (Service Employees International Union). Add to this list former president Barack Hussein Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former Attorney general, Eric Holder.


If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Melissa Martin
8 months ago

COSAction (conventionofstates.com)


Randall Schmidt, LtCol, USAF,(ret)
8 months ago

I am cancelling my association, support and membership in AMAC

8 months ago

They’re working FOR you to try and reign in the DC swamp. They deserve your support.

8 months ago

I’d like a lot more details on these amendments. Would love to move this trash to the Potomac. But lets agree on whats gonna be presented. I’m sure many good things. But it can and will swing both ways. When do we see these proposed amendments in their entirety?

Melissa Martin
8 months ago
Reply to  DAMoore


Also here is a video explaining Convention of States


9 months ago

Need rondezvous 4 each state.

9 months ago

Each member state of COS should be prepared for and with backup.

Helen Sabin
11 months ago


Helen Sabin
11 months ago

This is one of the most biased articles I have ever read. Shame on ELLEN CORA for spreading myths. Shame on AMAC for putting these lies out there. The article begins with huge one – the “safest way” is to have congress do it. What nonsense is this. Congress has been trampling on our rights for ages and the worst is right now with Biden in the White House. Do you think for one moment that congress would vote themselves TERM LIMITS? That they will restrict their power that they have stolen from the states? The Article V is the safest way as 38 states have to RATIFY anything done at the gathering of commissioners who just PROPOSE amendments and that’s it. Then WE THE PEOPLE vote on those amendments. The readers of this article out to go to some other senior group that doesn’t spread lies and misinformation like is in this worthless piece that is not true.

Robert Wood
11 months ago

While I’m in favor of a CoS, Washington politicians and the bureaucrats they have appointed have seized power mostly by ignoring our laws and their oaths of office and, without authorization, making up a lot of administrative laws that violate the U.S. Constitution. They have done all this, largely, without ever having to face any penalties, whether they be dismissal from office, fines, jail time or other deterrents to acting beyond their powers. This needs to stop by any appropriate means at hand. Where existing law may be shown to have been violated, but those violations went unpunished, investigations need to undertaken, evidence presented and, when called for, trials conducted and penalties levied. Much of this, I believe could be done within our federal system as it is simply by a willingness to move forward, using Cos as a means of assuring that the usurpation of power by our central government be stopped and prevented from happening again. It may be that a CoS, once put in motion, should be kept in placer a foreseeable future.

Helen Sabin
11 months ago
Reply to  Robert Wood

You are exactly right Robert and AMAC is lying through this author about the Convention of States and how it works. We left the for this and other egregious reasons. They are a tool of the Left.

C. R. Bennett
1 year ago

Concern about a run away Article V, Convention of States are often overblown. The reason this is the case is because any proposed Ammendment coming from a COS must be ratified by 38 state legislatures.

That’s 75% of the states! So if a so-called runaway convention were to occur, there is a built in safeguard.

Helen Sabin
11 months ago
Reply to  C. R. Bennett

You are absolutely correct. Keep spreading the word and encourage others to call for a Convention of States in their own state. Ignore this piece of propaganda from AMAC – a tool of the left.

Rod J Moser
1 year ago

Question: Do the citizens themselves, have the power to vote on term limits within congress or does that power go to the elected state legislatures from the convening states?

Melissa Martin
8 months ago
Reply to  Rod J Moser

A state can call a convention of states to propose amendments for term limits. That is one of the three amendments that COSA is now working to get 38 states for. So far there are 19 on these three amendments that we want proposed:

Impose term limits on federal officials. With a reelection rate of 93%, our federal legislators remain in office for decades to pursue their personal ambitions, at the expense of the people they are supposed to represent. Getting rid of career politicians is an important first step.
Impose spending limits on the federal government via a Balanced Budget amendment or imposing a Fair Tax. Our national debt plus unfunded government pensions have reached $150 Trillion, which is a $450,000 debt for every American. It’s hard to believe that our federal legislators let this happen. They are poor stewards of our money and must be constrained.
Limit the federal government’s ability to regulate. The constitution is explicit in the areas that the federal government has authority. Today, the government has encroached on practically every aspect of out lives. It’s time to restrict their authority to the limitations of the document they swore to uphold.
Check out conventionofstates.com and click take action.

Mike Codding
1 year ago

The original convention only exercised the powers given it; otherwise it would never have been ratified by the states nor amended by the first congress!

1 year ago

I think foremost and most life changing for America would be to eliminate corporation powers being involved in government. NO LONGER should those running for office only be the wealthy and those supported by corporations. We should outlaw all involvement of corporations and media in elections, and give each STATE the power to freely provide information about EVERY candidate on a website with each candidate having free access to a page to promote themselves through literature and videos. No more lies and selling of scams via the media who are controlled by greedy corporations. People as poor as Abraham Lincoln could run for office with enough signatures from local supports and have all of the information needed to know who they are on the State run website. Each county of that State would have access to the website to promote the individuals of their country for local elections as well. The website cannot be limited to a small few selected or favored individuals and there must be a board for complaints of any power abuse that would limit candidates or the people getting information about the candidate.

1 year ago

I hope and pray we can take our Country back. These people in our government are criminals and have thrown our constitution to the curb.

Helen Sabin
11 months ago
Reply to  Francie

A convention of states will do this. Ignore the bias, myths and lies in this article.

Charles Browning
2 years ago

Hello All,
The constitution was written and has lasted for a reason. The Federal government has greatly overstepped it’s powers granted by the constitution. The democrats and many republicans have ignored the intensions of our Founding Fathers, and liberals, it is Founding not Funding. The people need to remember we are a Republic not a democracy, which is not taught anymore. The cancel culture IS cancelling our history. The states need to get away from the national teachers unions and adopt a curriculum that teaches our real history and the State powers would not be in question.

Helen Sabin
11 months ago


Leni Burney
2 years ago

I am for this, we need to save the republic, our country and freedom. I cannot see how the majority of the population is going along with this mess. Even Dems must know there is something radically wrong. All I pray for each day is to save our country. Lets do this

Jackie Watson
2 years ago

Do it. Biden is out of control and is acting like a dictator signing all those executive orders. They are trying to change voting to fixed all the time and letting in millions of unvetted illegals. This needs to stop.

Roselee Hogan
2 years ago

Based on the degree of organization and funding behind the riots seen over the past year, I believe those behind these progressive efforts are several steps ahead of us in their plans to change the direction of our nation.

Based on the failure of State Legislatures to enforce their own laws in the 2020 federal election, I have no confidence that a Convention of the States would voluntarily restrict itself to just a few Amendments as passed by these States. 

Based on the actions of media and technology companies, I am seriously concerned that any unconstitutional actions taken at a Convention of the States would either be ignored or would be presented as perfectly legal and anyone who dissents would be completely shut down and persecuted.

Based on the systemic failure of State Courts, the US Congress, and the US Supreme Court to prevent or correct or even examine evidence of fraud and other irregularities in the 2020 federal election, I believe they would likewise ignore unconstitutional actions taken by a Convention of the States, thereby allowing our precious US Constitution to be completely destroyed.

Based on the lack of response from our citizenry, I am afraid most people would “go along to get along” with whatever happens.  

Helen Sabin
11 months ago
Reply to  Roselee Hogan

There cannot be any unconstitutional actions taken at a COS as the delegates of commissioners who are sent by their states do NOT do anything but PROPOSE amendments. Those that are passed at the convention then are returned to WE THE PEOPLE (You and me and millions of others) of 38 states who THEN VOTE on those. IF passed, they become part of the Constitution at that point. I suggest 6 years for congress and that’s it. Your thoughts. You can read all about the COS at their website: convention of states.com. Download their booklet and read. You will see how you have been lied to by this author and the bias in her writing.

Rebecca Wilkerson
2 years ago

I’m for the convention of states but only to limit the power and scope of the current government in Washington DC. Term limits, definitely. I’m not interested and changing our constitution. I’m not interested in getting rid of the Electoral College. It has a purpose and needs to stand. I am interested in seeing to it that we do whatever it takes 2 be certain that the voting machines we have are either unable to be manipulated or gotten rid of all together. And the election observers are not to be messed with in any way shape or form . Where the votes are being counted is where the observers will be . My interest is simply in limiting the power in Washington DC. I’m hesitant for this to come about because of what I’ve read concerning how the power of the convention of States could get out of hand trying to change our constitution. I think before a Convention of states is called there should be agreements sign stating what you will not do . Such as trying to change our constitution . Someone contacted me I believe last year to get me involved. At the time I was occupied elsewhere.

2 years ago

I agree

Helen Sabin
11 months ago

Term limits for congress and federal employees like Fauci is one of the three proposals. But if 38 states ratify the proposals, then it does change the constitution. Congress can no longer stay in office longer than we the people allow them to stay there with term limits. I say no more than 6 years just like a senator. They do enough damage in one year much less six.

Helen Sabin
11 months ago

The delegates to a gathering ONLY PROPOSE AMENDMENTS that are limited to the three topics that each state agrees to in their application. They DO NOT CHANGE the constitution. They have NO POWER to do so. Understand? Then the amendments that are passed are returned to WE THE PEOPLE (YOU and me and millions from 38 others states to RATIFY those amendments. Only then does anything change the constitution. Don’t believe the lies told in this article or those you hear from the LEFT>. Consider that one of the amendments is TERM LIMITS FOR CONGreSS!! Do you think they will ever vote themselves out of office?

John Mullis
2 years ago

This article has numerous errors in what was stated versus what is factual. It is obvious that the author did little research into the original conventions that were called in 1786 and 1787 along with researching the federalist papers. Sad that inaccurate information was shared with our senior citizens

2 years ago
Reply to  John Mullis

So what are these so called errors? Explain your position.

1 year ago
Reply to  John Mullis

There is no way for a “runaway” convention. There are too many safeguards from our founding fathers. There would have to be 37 states agreeing to change anything. Do you know how difficult that is? The only topics allowed from the Constitution are :
1. decreasing the power and scope of the federal government 2. Term limits 3. Balance the budget
That is it! Can you imagine if we did those three things!!! Our country would be saved!!
Oh, and George Soros wants to stop this from happening….Tell you something????

Helen Sabin
11 months ago
Reply to  L.K.

38 states to ratify not 37. 34 to propose amendments.

Lover of Freedom
2 years ago

Just an ordinary senior citizen of 76 years. I feel that I was raised in a fabulous time when society was much politer and politicians still felt responsible to the people. I was raised on a farm in upstate NY, family worked hard, hard, hard. I want the Convention of States to become strong and break the monopoly, dogged, dictatorship of all politicians in Washington, DC. It must be done in order for America to survive. Sadly our press has also been destroyed. They no longer present news they twist, edit and spew discourse, fear, insurgency. Propagate intolerance between races and people of different preferences be they sexual, religious or whatever. I am disgusted with information services, TV, FB, cellphones, movies with their pounding negativity and constant barrage of broadcasting negativeness ALL the time. A more positive presentation of people must be seen in order for society to change……thanks.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x