Government Watch

Odd Trends: More Americans Remain on Food Stamps, Post-Recession


from – – by Kevin Glass

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, commonly referred to as food stamps) has seen a meteoric rise in enrollment in the last fifteen years, and especially in the wake of the 2008 recession. The spike in SNAP recipients post-2008 is to be expected – but the maintenance of those high enrollment numbers is an anomaly.

American Enterprise Institute scholar Robert Doar testified before the House Committee on Agriculture recently to examine this exact question. Doar notes that changes in the SNAP program that took place during this time period may disincentivize work requirements – and keep SNAP participation among working-age population artificially high.

As Doar notes:

In the four years following the end of the downturn in 2009, the number of SNAP recipients increased by 7.3 million. Moreover, the percentage of the population receiving food stamps increased from 13 percent to 15 percent. To give perspective on this number, we can compare the recent recovery with the recovery after the recession of the 1980’s, whose duration and unemployment levels are most comparable. Adjusting for population, in the four years following the 1981-82 recession, there was a 12.5 percent decline in food stamp recipients. In the four years following the 2007-09 recession, SNAP recipients increased by 15.6 percent. Were this recent recovery to have behaved similarly to that of the 1980’s, by 2013 only 11.5 percent of the population would have been receiving SNAP benefits: 36 million individuals as opposed to 47.6 million. That is not a small difference.


By itself, SNAP benefits may not be enough to reduce the incentive for a recipient to go to work, or to move from part-time to full-time regular employment, but when combined with unreported earnings or other assistance programs — perhaps most notably unemployment insurance benefits – the program does appear to allow a significant number of adult recipients to remain out of work longer than they might otherwise. Without some effort to require these SNAP recipients to participate in employment programs such as those offered under TANF, I fear that the number of non-working, nonelderly, nondisabled SNAP recipients will remain high.

The SNAP program is actually one of the most helpful and targeted of our federal welfare state program. But as said by Doar, who a former SNAP overseer in his time in New York State government, the program has to be viewed as a piece of the overall safety net, and the incentives it provides in tandem with other programs may be harmful. The post-recession increase in utilization of the SNAP program has to be viewed as a new and unique – and possibly detrimental – phenomenon.

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pete Ferretti
8 years ago

Don’t change Cooperate Tax Code a la Obama who has never been correct in anything he has ever done. Instead, use the great ‘carrot & stick’ in a win/win manner. Reduce the Cooperate Tax Rate in US to 12% IF THE BUSINESS (tiny to giant) submits a 1 page (or less) Notarized form stating that they used at least 5% of their earnings either to improve the plight of their employees or their Business. ANY VIOLATIONS (including no submission or 2 pages or more) results in a 36% Tax levy.

Pete Ferretti
8 years ago

Tie it solely to the poverty level which varies by state in Life, number in family, etc. and issue a Zip Card based on these characteristics. All others who misuse Food Stamps should receive hefty fines that must be returned to the Food Stamp fund.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x