Government Watch / Instagram / Politics

Justice Kamala? Rumors of Breyer Retirement Set Off Frenzy Among Democrats

AMAC Exclusive – By Daniel Roman

harris

Jeffrey Toobin, the scandal-plagued “legal analyst” for CNN, caused quite a stir Monday, and this time it was not for his Zoom etiquette. Rather, Toobin managed to set off a firestorm by claiming inside knowledge about several points of Democrats’ sensitivity: The Supreme Court, Justice Stephen Breyer, their ever more nominal Senate majority, and the future of Vice President Kamala Harris.

In one stroke, Toobin provoked a reaction by liberals terrified that like Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer will die on the bench, either under a Republican president following 2024 or after Republicans retake the Senate majority in the midterms, which would leave any prospective candidate subject to GOP veto. Such a veto would almost certainly be used against Kentaji Brown Jackson, an appeals court judge whose name Toobin misspelled, infamous for far-left leanings. Breyer has hitherto resisted a campaign of public pressure for his resignation, and a Supreme Court nomination would give Joe Biden a chance for a “political win” with his base, even if it would do little to alter the Court’s conservative majority.

Equally provocative was Toobin’s decision to include Vice President Harris as a long-shot. Despite that modifier, the inclusion sparked the most attention, not least because Harris’ supporters cannot fail to see a deliberate conspiracy in any mention of their idol in a derogatory sense. Toobin was charged by The Nation’s Elie Mystal of working as a stalking horse for the Biden White House, which deliberately leaked the “false” information in an effort to advance their agenda of getting rid of Harris. How spreading rumors about nominating Harris to a non-existent vacancy would advance an agenda of removing her from the Vice Presidency is unclear. That would require actually nominating her for the role, in which case the leak would have to be accurate. But expecting logic from Harris’ political operation is a fools’ errand.

They are self-aware enough at least to understand that their candidate is a liability. Her numbers have not improved, and Harris, who oversaw the Democrats’ “voting rights push” has been aggressive in insisting that blame for its failure should be spread far, wide, and preferably away from her. A long way from Harry Truman’s, “the buck stops here.”

How would a Harris nomination even work? Democrats have a mere 50 seats in the 100-member U.S. Senate, and their majority comes solely through the vote of the Vice President. Even assuming Harris could vote for her own nomination, that would leave the post of Vice President vacant, and the Senate deadlocked 50-50. While Senate rules would technically keep the Democrats in control until someone could gain a majority to change the organizational resolution, any replacement Vice President would require confirmation with 51 votes, meaning at least one Republican. And if the GOP chose to filibuster, it is hard to see any Republicans voting for a rule change, even if some would be inclined to confirm any replacement in an up or down vote. While this would leave Nancy Pelosi next-in-line for the Presidency at the moment, if the position remained vacant after January of 2023 and the GOP took control, a Speaker Kevin McCarthy would be first-in-line to succeed Biden. A situation Democrats would be unlikely to risk with the oldest president in history.

The whole controversy illustrates how small Democratic ambitions have become. “Voting Rights” legislation is dead. “Build Back Better” appears to be dead in its current form. The Supreme Court has struck down Biden’s private employer mandate, while Omicron seems likely to do what Biden could not: provide a framework for Americans to move beyond Covid. Replacing a liberal Supreme Court Justice with another liberal is what counts for a “win” these days. Getting rid of the party’s vice president and heir apparent counts as an exciting fantasy.

Democrats are only now coming to terms with the extent of Donald Trump’s most lasting achievement. While liberals allege there has been a far-right takeover of the courts, betraying a perspective from which anything other than their own control of that institution implies illegitimacy, there is truth to the claim that for the first time in almost a century, the liberals/left do not have control of the judicial branch of government. There is a split among the conservatives, between ideological conservatives who wish to use the courts aggressively and those who oppose any involvement of the courts in controversial political issues—and this split is on display between, say Brett Kavanaugh and Sam Alito. Nonetheless, for the first time in decades, there is a clear majority that will not consider using the Court as a cavalry for liberal policies that cannot muster sufficient support to pass them within the elected branches of government.

Half of the liberal panic, as evidenced by the obsession with Breyer’s retirement, is driven by a recognition of what this means, and half by projection in which liberals assume that conservatives will use the courts as they would have, only to advance conservative policies without majority support, much as liberals did for years. Hence the need to stop it.

In the long range, this debate is futile for them. Ultimately, the only path forward for anyone, but especially for Democrats, is to abandon their support for policies that turn off voters, and win elections, implementing their agenda the old-fashioned way. This is what Joe Manchin told them when he reminded them if they wanted to not have to rely on his vote, they should have elected more Democratic senators. The panic over Breyer shows they expect to elect a whole lot less. And would quite like to be rid of their VP while they are at it.

Daniel Roman is the pen name of a frequent commentator and lecturer on foreign policy and political affairs, both nationally and internationally. He holds a Ph.D. in International Relations from the London School of Economics. 


We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!


Subscribe
Notify of
36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Karen
3 months ago

OMG…..ya gotta be kidding. Her career b4 the VP job wasn’t pink and fuzzy. Please don’t do it. BIG MISTAKE!!!!!!!!!!!

Andrew P
3 months ago

I thought neutronium (neutron star matter) was the densest.

BlessdAmerican
3 months ago

There’s a lot of truth here, but I am confused about the incident in ’04. Not sure what you are referring to. Yes, we Americans have become complacent, but a lot of that is because Civics and American history is no longer taught. We are pumping out generations of government common core, indoctrinated “social justice” snowflakes who have no idea who they are as Americans, and not a clue as to their civic RESPONSIBILITIES in a government Of, For and BY the PEOPLE.

WE ARE THE GOVT. We are obligated to KNOW EXACTLY who and what we are voting for. AND to run for offices ourselves.

Let’s face it. Our nation and government was created by Christians FOR Christians, and is unfit for anything but a moral society.

We have to face the ORIGIN of the problem.

BlessdAmerican
3 months ago

omg, can you just imagine heels up harris CACKLING uncontrollably in court sessions? I’d love to be a fly on the wall to see the faces of the other justices …. ROTF!

Luke
4 months ago

Anyone who would support or even suggest this criminally insane animal as fit for ANY judge-ship is completely unhinged.

Morbious
4 months ago

The dems are not Liberals. Theyre communists.

Barb
4 months ago

Denise, what are you referring to regarding the painful event in our nation in ’04, under Clinton’s direction? Koresh & Branch Davidians was Feb 28 to April 19, 1993; Oklahoma City bombing was on April 19, 1995. In 2004, George W Bush was president. So I’m confused as to what you mean.

VikkiC
4 months ago

She has never practiced law, nor sat on any judicial bench. Of course she’s qualified to sit on the Supreme Court! And Biden just said on national TV that she will be running with him in 2024…I don’t know which one is goofier, Biden or Harris!

Andrew P
3 months ago
Reply to  VikkiC

Biden is senile. Harris just cackles when she doesn’t have anything to say about Joey Demento’s disasters.

Id est quod id est
3 months ago
Reply to  VikkiC

“She [Harris] has never practiced law, nor sat on any judicial bench.” That never stopped a liberal from being appointed to anything. Biden openly admitted to selecting Kamala because she was a POC and female. Period. He “lowered the bar” and it hit the ground.

Joe from Las Vegas Nevada
4 months ago

Yeah Right! Kamala voting herself into the Supreme Court! Now if that wouldn’t prove corruption, and point the finger at each and every Democrat!

Andrew P
3 months ago

Her voting for herself in this circumstance is both legal and proper. However, the real question is will she get 50 Democrat Senators to vote for her? She will need them all, and I have my doubts.

Barb
4 months ago

OMG!!–God help us all! Can you imagine Biden & Pelosi, two bumbling old fools–one who is constantly stuttering, touching his nose & next to his eyes, can’t get 5 words out of his mouth that makes any sense, can’t say a word without a teleprompter, then Pelosi who is constantly flailing her arms, can’t get words out because she can’t think straight, crazy eyes, and making a fist up in the air like she is on the Black Panthers party. I’m telling you! And when Biden would kick the bucket, then we have President Pelosi?!! Really, God help us all….. we will all need it. The party of crookedness would continue.

Honey
4 months ago
Reply to  Barb

How about Biden and Walters? That would make Pelosi look good.

Barb
4 months ago
Reply to  Honey

Walters or Waters? If Maxine Waters, she’s in the same boat with Biden & Pelosi, and it’s sinking fast.

BlessdAmerican
3 months ago
Reply to  Barb

In all fairness, pelosi can’t be far from kicking the bucket herself. Not that I would wish that on anyone, but that witch should have retired a LONG time ago. Nasty, treasonous, malicious and greedy little POS that she is.

R.J. from Arizona
4 months ago

Just the thought of that scenario gives me nightmares.

Kay
4 months ago

You can readily check her back ground by goggle Willie Brown. She was his mistress while in her early 20’s and he was a married man in his 60’s. She used him in every way possible to build her self.
She is a dud and in truth a whore who built herself as a prostitute. Is this what we need in the Supreme Court? Stop her now, she is a disgrace to women.

Morbious
4 months ago
Reply to  Kay

Quite right

Georgia Broz
4 months ago

How did she even manage to get a saw degree? She seems like a real ditz.

Barb
4 months ago
Reply to  Georgia Broz

Harris is an airhead ditz.

Judi
4 months ago
Reply to  Georgia Broz

Just remember: Half of all law school graduates graduated in the bottom half of their class!

VikkiC
4 months ago
Reply to  Judi

Well, now there’s 2 of them in the White House!

Id est quod id est
3 months ago
Reply to  Georgia Broz

“How did she even manage to get a law degree?”
A rhetorical question, we presume?
Boston U. even gave AOC a degree in economics. Yish!

Philip Hammersley
4 months ago

Kamal is more ignorant than “wise Latina” Sotomayor. Plus her only qualification is lying on her back. Don’t know if that’s necessary for SCOTUS!

Barb
4 months ago

Watch out Kavanaugh, she didn’t get you before, but she may aim for you if she gets on the Supreme Court.

Carol
4 months ago

How can Harris vote for herself in a Senate tie for a Supreme Court seat? Isn’t that a conflict of interest? I’m not a lawyer and don’t know if this has ever happened in the past. Anyone out there with an incite would be helpful.

PaulE
4 months ago
Reply to  Carol

In this Hillary Clinton fantasy, Harris would step down as V.P. as soon as Breyer retires. Then Biden is supposed to select Hillary as his new V.P. in her fantasy.. Then it would be Hillary who would be the 51st vote in the Senate to confirm Harris for the SC slot. Read my post below to see all this is nothing more than just another desperate attempt by Hillary Clinton to maneuver herself into a position to replace Biden as POTUS. Nothing more.

The reality is the people that control the Democrat Party today, the Socialists like Sanders, AOC, the rest of the squad and many others, have zero use for Hillary Clinton. Hillary just can’t seem to accept her time is past and she is yesterday’s news.

EMG
4 months ago

No one would seriously consider putting this no talent, no skills, no personality on the Supreme Court would they?

Sher
4 months ago
Reply to  EMG

A total disgrace to AMERICA to put this Tramp anyplace except out!

Boz
4 months ago

This hoar wiII never be anything but v.p.

Sher
4 months ago
Reply to  Boz

HOPEFULLY, she will resign. Or IMPEACHED right after bumbling Biden does. FJB

Andrew P
3 months ago
Reply to  Boz

I expect her to become President as soon as Dementia Joe dies, which will probably happen before the end of his term.

Dan W.
4 months ago

Great. An article about rumors written under an anonymous pen name.

Does anyone else see the irony in this hard-hitting journalistic scenario ?

PaulE
4 months ago
Reply to  Dan W.

Yeah, this so-called “story” was floated last week after Hillary’s people started making the media rounds. The grand “plan”, if you really want to even call it that, is that Justice Breyer would be “persuaded” to step down and Joe Biden would nominate Harris to fill the SC seat. Thus getting the dead weight of Harris out of the way and maintaining the SC seat as a “progressive” vote. Biden is then supposed to pick Hillary as his new V.P. to bring “stability and competence” to the administration and to pull up the administration’s dismal polling numbers. The final bit of this ludicrous “story” is that six months or so after that happens, Biden is supposed to resign for whatever reason the Democrat Party dreams up and Hillary becomes POTUS. Thus achieving her goal of being POTUS without having to endure the pesky election process. To say this is nothing more than the fevered dream of an increasingly delusional Hillary is putting it way too mildly.

Kevin S
4 months ago
Reply to  PaulE

I hope you’re right. But I wouldn’t put anything past this cabal of criminals. Blatant even brazen violations of ethics, law and the Constitution paint quite a portrait of their basic evil.

36
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x