Your Medicare Advisor

GOP Doctors Caucus Releases “A Doctors’ Note on Medicare”

June 2012  –  (WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Senate and House Republican physicians released a short tutorial highlighting key facts about the Medicare program and detailing challenges the program faces if Washington does not adopt bipartisan solutions to avoid the program’s insolvency.

Medicare Fact Sheets From Physicians In Congress

Dear Fellow American –

There has been a lot of talk in Washington, DC in recent months about the future of the Medicare program.

Everyone agrees that Medicare is a critically important program providing needed health coverage for millions of Americans. However, not everyone understands that the current Medicare program is on an unsustainable course.

Because the program is on a path toward bankruptcy in the near future, the status quo in Medicare is a threat to seniors’ care. Therefore, the greatest threat to seniors’ Medicare benefits is not reform or change, but inaction.

In fact, Congress must change Medicare to save the program.

We believe Congress has a moral obligation to adopt common-sense changes to strengthen Medicare and protect seniors. Medicare faces a number of different kinds of problems.

That’s why we are sharing with you our “doctors’ note” with a number of facts about the program.

Every American has a stake in the future of Medicare.

And every American deserves candor about the challenges the program faces.

We hope that this presentation will help further the conversation about the need to adopt bipartisan solutions.

10 Facts That Impact The Medicare Program

1.   Longevity Has Increased Dramatically, But Medicare’s Age Of Eligibility Has Not. In 1965 the average life expectancy was 70.2 years. However, because of improvements in medical innovation and public health, today life expectancy is nearing 80 years.1

2.   Medicare Loses An Estimated $60-$100 Billion Each Year To Waste, Fraud And Abuse.2  While the current Medicare program loses billions of taxpayer dollars each year, unfortunately, even if it were possible to totally prevent or eliminate all fraud and abuse, the program would still face insolvency.

3.   Seniors Receive, On Average, Three Times The Amount Of Benefits They Paid Into The System. Consider the example of an average-wage, two-earner couple together earning $87,000 a year. Upon retiring in 2011, they would have paid $119,000 in Medicare payroll taxes during their careers. But they can expect to receive medical services – from prescriptions to hospital care – worth $357,000, or about three times what they paid into the program during their career.3

4.   Seniors Pay Only A Quarter Of The Cost Of A Doctor Visit, Even Though LBJ Envisioned They Would Pay Half. When the program began in 1966, seniors’ Medicare premiums were intended to finance 50% of Part B costs per aged enrollee with the remainder funded by the federal government. President Lyndon Johnson highlighted this 50/50 cost share when he signed Medicare into law saying, “And under a separate plan, when you are 65 you may be covered for medical and surgical fees whether you are in or out of the hosp ital. You will pay $3 per month after you are 65 and your Government will contribute an equal amount.”4

5.   Currently, Each Day About 10,000 Baby Boomers Age Into Medicare.5 The rapid growth in eligible beneficiaries places an unprecedented strain on the program’s already-shaky financing.

6.   The Number Of Workers Paying Into The System Has Declined Over Time And Will Continue To Decline. Baby boomers started to retire in 2008. This year the oldest of their generation turned 65 and began enrolling in Medicare. In 1965 there were 4.6 workers per beneficiary. Today there are 2.9 workers per beneficiary.6

7.   Medicare Is Running a Cash Deficit – and Has Been For Some Time. The Hospital Insurance Trust Fund has been running a deficit since 2008 and is projected to continue to do so forever. According to a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, in 2011, the Medicare program ran a $288.3 billion cash shortfall. In fact, since the creation of the program in 1965, Medicare has run cash deficits each year, except 1966 and 1974.7

8.   Under the current fee-for-service Medicare program, seniors do not have the peace of mind that they are protected against significant out-of-pocket medical expenses. As the President’s Fiscal Commission explained, “Medicare beneficiaries must navigate a hodge-podge of premiums, deductibles, and copays that offer neither spending predictability nor protection from catastrophic financial risk.”8

9.   The Medicare Program Spends a LOT. Under current law and assuming a 10-year ‘Doc Fix’, net Medicare spending totals $2.8 trillion over the next five years, and $6.6 trillion over the next 10 years. This is 25 percent of all mandatory spending, and approximately 15 percent of all federal spending.9

10. About 25 Percent of Medicare Program Expenditures Occur Within the Last Year of Life.10

10 Facts Seniors Need To Know About Medicare’s Future

1.   Currently, More Than 1 In 10 Physicians Are Not Accepting New Medicare Patients. Physician surveys show that while a small minority, some physicians do not accept Medicare patients.  For 2008, the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey shows 10 percent did not accept new Medicare patients and 17 percent of primary care physicians did not accept new Medicare patients. In another 2008 physician survey, about 12 percent reported accepting some new Medicare patients and 14 percent indicated that they did not accept any new Medicare patients. 11

2.   When The Hospital Insurance Trust Fund Is Insolvent, No One Knows How Providers Will Get Paid. As the Congressional Research Service explains: “There are no provisions in the Social Security Act that govern what would happen if [insolvency] were to occur. For example, there is no authority in law for the program to use general revenue to fund Part A services in the eve nt of such a shortfall.”12

3.   To Control Medicare Spending, Instead Of Trusting Seniors, The President Empowered 15 Unelected Bureaucrats. The President’s health care law empowered a board of unelected bureaucrats to “reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending.” These 15 Medicare bureaucrats will serve on the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) and will be politically-appointed. They will be charged with developing proposals that cut Medicare – and because the panel is prohibited from suggesting common-sense changes, the panel will only be able to cut reimbursements to physicians and other health care providers, resulting in delay and denial of care. Unfortunately, judicial review of IPAB decisions is prohibited by law, so seniors and physicians cannot seek relief in court even if they are negatively impacted by the Board’s decisions. 13

4.   Doctors Overwhelmingly Believe the Independent Payment Advisory Board Will Hurt Seniors’ Access to Care. In a recent survey, 80 percent of doctors said the Independent Payment Advisory Board in the President’s health care law will cut reimbursement rates to doctors, which will harm seniors’ access to care. 14

5.   Without Congressional Action, Medicare Reimbursement Rates Will Drop About 30 Percent At the End of the Year – Which Would Harm Seniors’ Access to Care.  The Medicare program reimburses physicians by using a payment mechanism known as the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). Congress established the SGR in 1997 as a funding formula designed to adhere to overall spending targets. The SGR works by effectively decreasing reimbursement levels one year if Medicare reimbursements to physicians another year were higher than a set target. Though cost-containment is the right goal, the SGR mechanism failed to achieve its goal. In fact, since 2004, Congress has had to work to prevent the SGR from huge reductions in payments to physicians that could harm seniors’ access to care. Now, unless Congress intervenes, Medicare’s physician reimbursements will plummet by about 30 percent on January 1, 2013 because of the SGR.

6.   The President’s Health Care Law Took $530 Billion from Medicare To Spend Other Programs Not for Seniors. The health care law cut more than half a trillion dollars from the Medicare program to fund new government programs. These cuts to Medicare were double-counted, giving the illusion of extending Medicare’s solvency – even though the dollars are really being spent on new government bureaucracies. CBO reiterated this conclusion when the Director of the office explained that the cuts to Medicare cannot “pay for future Medicare spending [and therefore increase its solvency] and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation…”15

7.   As Soon as 2017, Medicare Could Run Out of Money to Pay All the Program’s Hospital Bills.16

8.   Many Seniors on Medicare Advantage Will Lose Their Plan. More than one in four seniors are currently on Medicare Advantage. However, according to the Actuary of the Medicare program, by 2017 when Medicare Advantage cuts in the President’s health law are fully implemented, roughly half of seniors who like the Medicare Advantage plan they have will lose it. According to the Actuary, Medicare Advantage’s estimated enrollment and benefits will be cut in half. This will undoubtedly be unwelcome news for the more than one in four seniors who currently enjoy a Medicare Advantage plan.

9.   If Congress Reformed Supplemental Medicare Coverage, Four Out of Five Seniors Could Save Money. 

The Kaiser Family Foundation released a report evaluating various proposed Medigap reforms. As the report noted, “in 2008, about one in six Medicare beneficiaries, over 7 million, had an individually purchased Medicare supplemental insurance policy, known as Medigap (and no other source of supplemental coverage).” Four out of 5 seniors would save money from Medigap reform: “The majority of Medigap enrollees are projected to see a reduction in net out-of-pocket costs (including premiums), but about one in five Medigap enrollees would pay more.”17

10. The Actuary Of The Medicare Program Projects That 15% Of Hospitals Will Close In The Coming Decade.  The Actuary of the

Medicare program has warned that provider cuts could put 15 percent of hospitals out of business within a decade.18  He noted, if the projected cuts occur, “Medicare beneficiaries would almost certainly face increasingly severe problems with access to care.”19 The Actuary also warned that “by 2019 the [cuts to provider reimbursements] would result in negative total facility margins for about 15 percent of hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies. This estimated percentage would continue to increase, reaching roughly 25 percent in 2030 and 40 percent by 2050. In practice, providers could not sustain continuing negative margins and…would have to withdraw from providing services to Medicare beneficiaries, merge with other provider groups, or shift substantial portions of Medicare costs to [other] payers.”20

10 Facts Policymakers Should Consider In Reforming Medicare

1.   The Actuary Of The Medicare Program Says That Congressional Action Will Be Required to Ensure Seniors Have Continued Access to Care. In May 2012, the Medicare Actuary said that “it is reasonable to expect that Congress would find it necessary to legislatively override or otherwise modify the reductions in the future to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries continue to have access to health care services.”21

2.   Solving Medicare’s Long-Range Financial Imbalance By Raising Taxes Is Untenable. The 2012 Medicare Actuaries report explains that making immediate changes to bring Medicare into solvency would “require an immediate 47-percent increase in the standard tax rate” or  an “immediate 26-percent reduction in [Medicare program] expenditures.”22

3.   The Medicare Trustees’ Alternative Scenario, Shows Unfunded Liabilities Over A 75-Year Period Of $36.9 Trillion. That breaks down as follows: Part A: $8.3 trillion, Part B: $21 trillion, and Part D: $7.5 trillion.23

4.   Taxpayers Subsidize Millionaires on Medicare. According to the independent Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, there are about 60,000 seniors enrolled in Medicare Part B who have annual incomes of more than $1,000,000 or more.24

5.   During His Entire Presidency, President Obama Has Not Offered a Plan to Save Medicare. For the sixth consecutive year (2007 through 2012), the Medicare Trustees were required by the Social Security Act to issue a Medicare funding warning in their an nual report. While a funding warning has been issued or in place every year the President has been in office, the administration continues to defy its obligation under the law to submit a legislative proposal to Congress in response to warnings issued by the Trustees. The President points to the new health care law as his response to the Medicare trigger, but the Trustees have issued funding warnings in all three reports since the health care law was enacted (2010 through 2012). In the summary of the report the Trustees clearly explain: “The warning directs the President to submit proposed legislation within 15 days of the next budget submission to respond to the warning and requires Congress t o consider the proposal on an expedited basis. To date, elected officials have not enacted legislation responding to these funding warnings which have been included in the five previous reports.”

6.   Medicare Is Running Out of Money. The Hospital Insurance Trust Fund has been running a deficit since 2008 and is projected to continue to do so forever. According to a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, in 2011, the Medicare program ran a $288.3 billion cash shortfall. In fact, since the creation of the program in 1965, Medicare has run cash deficits each year, except 1966 and 1974.25

7.   The President’s National Commission On Fiscal Responsibility And Reform Said “Federal Health Care Spending Represents Our Single Largest Fiscal Challenge Over The Long-Run.”26 Under current law, Medicare spending is expected to jump from $522.8 billion in 2010 to $932 billion in 2020.27

8.   Medicare’s Drug Benefit (Part D) Is Popular And Has Cost Less Than Expected. As former Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt noted in 2011,“The drug benefit, now in its sixth year, has outperformed all expectations. Seniors like it. Ninety percent of Medicare participants are in secure drug coverage and express strong satisfaction with the program in independent surveys. Scores of insurers participate in the program. In 2011, every senior in the country has access to a minimum of 28 drug plan options. Competition is working to hold down costs. Current projections by the Medicare actuaries show the 10-year costs of the drug legislation coming in 41 percent below estimates made when the bill passed.”28

9.   Over The Next 20 Years, The Share Of Medicare Beneficiaries Living At Or Above 600 Percent Of Poverty Is Projected To Increase By Half.  According to Kaiser Family Foundation analysis, between 2010 and 2030, the share of all Medicare beneficiaries living on incomes at or above 600 percent of poverty is projected to rise from 19 percent to 30 percent.29

10. It Is Not Possible To Raise Taxes High Enough to Ensure Medicare’s Long-Term Financial Solvency. Faced with Medicare’s financing challenges, some say Congress should just raise taxes to pay for current benefits. But just raising taxes does not fix the problem. For example, respected economists Kate Baicker and Jonathan Skinner found tax rates would have to jump 28 percent for the wealthiest Americans, just to keep Medicare solvent for another decade. And in this scenario, even the poorest Americans would see an in crease in their taxes. These huge tax hikes would be disastrous for American families in our economy. Raising taxes to paper over the problems with runaway Medicare spending would be short-sighted and selfish because it would leave seniors’ children and grandchildren with less economic opportunity.30


U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D.                                 U.S. Senator John Barrasso, M.D.

U.S. Senator John Boozman, O.D.                             U.S. Senator, Rand Paul, M.D.

U.S. Representative Phil Gingrey, M.D.                   U.S. Representative Phil Roe, M.D.

U.S. Representative Scott DesJarlais, M.D.           U.S. Representative Paul Gosar, D.D.S.

U.S. Representative Diane Black                                U.S. Representative Renee Ellmers

U.S. Representative John Fleming, M.D.                U.S. Representative Charles Boustany, M.D.

U.S. Representative Dan Benishek, M.D.                U.S. Representative Larry Bucshon, M.D.

U.S. Representative Andy Harris, M.D.

1 Kochanek, Kenneth D. et al, “Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2009,” National Vital Statistics Reports, Volume 59, Number 4, March 16, 2011,

2 Newt Gingrich& Barry Rand, “Stop Paying Crooks: Get Tough on Health-care Fraud,” Orlando Sentinel, September 29, 2010,

3 Urban Institute, “Social Security and Medicare Taxes and Benefits Over a Lifetime,” June 2011,

4 Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965. Volume II, entry 394, pp. 811-815, Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1966,

5  Pew Research Center, “Baby Boomers Approach Age 65 – Glumly,“ December 20, 2010,

6 Senger, Alyene, “Medicare at Risk: Visualizing the Need for Reform,” May 22, 2012,

7 Holtz-Eakin, Douglas and Nussle, Jim, “Medicare’s Dirty Little Secret,” April 25, 2012,

8 The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, “The Moment of Truth,” December 2010,

9 The Boards of Trustees, Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds, “Annual Report of the Boards of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds,” April 23, 2012,

10 Hogan, Christopher et al, “Medicare Beneficiaries’ Costs Of Care In The Last Year Of Life,” Health Affairs, Volume 20, Number 4, July 2001, Page 188-195,

11 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, “Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program,” June 2011,

12 “Drs Coburn, Barrasso, Gingrey and Roe Release Report on Coming Insolvency of Medicare,” April 16, 2012,

13 Senators Tom Coburn, M.D. and John Barrasso, M.D, “Medicare & You,” 2012,

14 New  Surv ey : 7 5%  of  Phy s icians Larg ely O ppos e t he Affo rdab le C are Act , t he Pres ide nt ’s Hea lt hca re Law  ,” March 29, 2012,

17 “New Report Shows 4 out of 5 Seniors Could Save Money From Medigap Reform,” August 16, 2011,

18 Foster, Richard S., Memo for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, April 22, 2010, Page 10,

19Shatto, John D. and Clemens, M. Kent, Memo for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, August 5, 2010, Page 5,

20 Shatto, John D. and Clemens, M. Kent, Memo for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service, May 18, 2012, Pages 8-9,

21 Shatto, John D. and Clemens, M. Kent, Memo for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, May 18, 2012, Page 1,

22 The Boards of Trustees, Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds, “Annual Rep ort of the Boards of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds,” April 23, 2012,, page 32

23Codespote, Suzanne, Memo for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, April 23, 2012

24 Coburn, Tom, M.D., “Subsidies of the Rich and Famous,” November 2011, Page 8,

25 Holtz-Eakin, Douglas and Nussle, Jim, “Medicare’s Dirty Little Secret,” April 25, 2012,

26 The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, “The Moment of Truth,” December 2010, Page 36,

27 Moffit, Robert, “The First Stage of Medicare Reform: Fixing the Current Program,” The Heritage Foundation, October 17, 2011, Footnote 4,

28 Leavitt, Michael, “A Prescription to Fix Medicare,” The Washington Post, May 19, 2011,

29 The Kaiser Family Foundation: Medicare Policy, “Projecting Income and Assets: What Might the Future Hold for the Next Generation of Medicare Beneficiaries?” June 2011,

30 Senators Tom Coburn, M.D. and John Barrasso, M.D, “Medicare & You,” 2012,



If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10 years ago

Medicaare needs to be fixed. All can agree on that simple thought. Fixing it requires a clear UNBIASED staemtn of all the relevant facts and figures and a related solution worked out by congress acting for the best interest of the people as a whole and not favorable to one group or another. When congress members grow up and act in the people’s interest rather than the interest they each serve, mediaes problems will be solved. Not until that messiah will the problems cease.

Sharon Holley
10 years ago

I know many people who pay many thousands of dollars for cosmetic surgery,but complain about the cost of
a co-pay for an illness or the cost of their medi-gap insurance. Many others pay thousands of dollars for travel
and vacations every year, but don’t have money for a prescription? Come on… long are we going to subsidize
these people?
Medicare should be for catastrophic illness only. That would cut down on the expensive bureaucracy that comes out
of these funds. And if it were limited only to those who have paid into the funds, that would eiminate at lot of the costs.

10 years ago

1) Your points do not address the other government-funded health programs that are also causing this breakdown
(eg: health care coverage for those who do not work (for whatever reason); health care coverage for those who are not citizens; health care coverage for those who are spouses (numbers soon to be expanded by gay marriage rights); medicare health care coverage after retiring from government and working a few years in private industry; . . .)
2) Your calculation of how much the average couple pays in, at an average family income of $87,000 is vastly understated:
a) Employers pay in an equal amount (and when I worked it was made clear to me that that was compensation to me)
b) Any amortization schedule would include income earned on the money taken by the government from folks. Here that would increase ending value of the payment from the couple by 3 to 5 times (at historical earning rates)
3) The only equitable way to address this health care crisis is for all earners (public as well as private employment – including senators and representatives and presidents and staff and military and state and local and education and . . .) to be in the system with equal benefits.
4) The only way to have the public believe the costs versus paid-in would be to adjust benefits so that it would take several years to gain full benefits (likely 20 or 25 years of paying into the system).

James Lowell
10 years ago

AMAC should challenge the physicians’ self-serving statement about us putting in $119,000 and getting $357,000 in benefits. From the taxpayer’s perspective, the calculation should be what would that $119,000 be with a reasonable rate of return. Rounding the amount to $120,000 and using the “Rule of 72,” I get a result of $300,000 over a 40-year period (from age 25 through age 65) using a conservative 5% return. So if I were allowed (or mandated) to keep and invest the Medicare “contributions,” my contributions would purchase $300K worth of medical services, not $120K. If the rate of return is greater than 5% (not unreasonable during my lifetime), my “contributions” would purchase even more. The problem is “contributing” to the government to squander on programs that benefit legislators provides no return on the money, thus eliminating the power of compounding. We need the government OUT of medical care, but with an enforced savings program that embraces the power of compounding.

10 years ago
Reply to  James Lowell


You are absolutely correct on the advantages of controlling our own money dedicated to addressing our health care needs. That’s the very reason why the policians will never release their grip on such money. Money is power and the politicans like the control being in their hands to spend it as they see fit to benefit their careers and long-term personal wealth after they eventually leave office or are forced out. Just look at the trail of former politicans, of both parties, becoming lobbyists for the very industries they oversaw during their terms in office.

10 years ago
Reply to  James Lowell

Or you could get one-half % as is being paid now. What then ?

Ron R
10 years ago

Glad I joined AMAC…compared to”you know who”! Never had this type of repartee of issues with them. Policy came came direct from DNC & White House, & spoon fed to members. Here it appears we get unvarnished facts & can make up our own minds. After all, isn’t that “matures” are supposed to do?

10 years ago

Besides the waste on “illegals” and outright fraud, why do we accept the fact that Americans pay 2 to 10 times the cost of perscription drugs as those in other countries ? And I note that nothing above was said about DIET. At the very least we should provide information to our people on how stay well and even reverse illnesses [And I don.t mean the heart and cancer diets now handed to patients],

My wife attended a breast cancer program put on by our our local hospital. During the six hours of talks by medical people and dieticians their was no mention of “PREVENTION”.


10 years ago
Reply to  ken

OK, tell us about preventing breast cancer.

10 years ago
Reply to  KP

My cousin had breast cancer and went to MD Anderson hospital, she was put on a blueberry diet for 72 hours and her cancer was in remission. That was 5 yrs ago and she is doing great.

Patricia Shulko
10 years ago

Let’s face it – our present government still spends more on illegals, other countries (not allies) and Presidential travel than on Medicare. If there is an honest politician today, it is rare as greed has taken over with the lobbyist making the decisions for most of our elected officials. Those who have been in service for any length of time have stolen the money in Social Security and Medicare to pay for their preferred programs that will gain them another election.

Government gives out information as to how we only paid in $$$$ and are receiving more than we had deducted from our pay – what amount has the politician paid in to get so much in return?? They certainly have not given more of themselves – they just keep taking – our military families, and safety services GIVE not take.

Ralph Ormsbee
10 years ago


Ralph Ormsbee
10 years ago

Hire me on with all that big money and give me the say I will have money in socail secuity that you would find hard to spend it all

Ralph Ormsbee
10 years ago

If we are having a hard time paying for the system why is washington trying to give mexico more money in retirement then you get on our system cost free and why do they have welfare and social security in portireco or how ever you spell it they pay nothing into this country

Ralph Ormsbee
10 years ago

Wefare has its own medical systems and they have 100% medical % dental 100% eye. Put the money into medicare and give the working people 100% services

Ralph Ormsbee
10 years ago

Lock up social Clinton does not need it to balance the budget any more and fix social security by placing all government workers from the presadent down with one source of retirement and that is the socail secrity system that we retire on what dothey do that makes them have the right to live above the laws that they make for us

Terry Beasley
10 years ago

I think if our government would start taking care of the American people and stop the illegal immigration which would stop all the money we spend on illegals in hospital and many other expenses, get out of the United Nations, stop the aid we are sending to our foreign countries who are our enemies, stop the squandering of money in Washington, such as Obamas czars, Air Force one being flown around like his everyday transportation, stop the vacations for Obamas family’ stop all the freeby flights for any member of congress to get home every weekend, stop all the high pay and extended benefits congress receives, and start making them all live like our military men and women, who are the ones who have made all of this possible, make all members of congress have health care just like the healthcare most Americans have, and I could go on and on, but the money that is spent in Washington foolishly today could save our country if it were spent properly. The problem is is that Obama and all his staff and most all Democrats and some Republicans are on a mission to destroy our country and have the muslims, which Obama is, take over and kill everything America stands for. He will probably get this done, but Jesus is coming back real soon, and then all of the corruptnous will be in vain. God Bless all of you and God Bless the USA.

10 years ago
Reply to  Terry Beasley

Terry I totally agree with everything you have said….if there were only more of us out there with the same feelings I am sure this President will not get re-elected….

Linda Pieters
10 years ago

I think we should go back to the intent of the original Medicare bill and require patients to pay half of a reasonable fee for doctor visits. Also, Medicare should be for those who have retired, not for those who are still working and can get insurance from their employer. Eligibility for Social Security should be adjusted up so that early retirement should be at reasonable ages compared to life expectancy less 3 years at a much reduced rate of benefits of full retirement age. That would help Social Security remain solvent also. Coverage for Medicare should cross state lines. Someone who is covered through a company or Medicare Advantage in one state should be able to get the same benefits whereever he or she goes in this country. Eliminate Out of Program higher deductibles.

10 years ago

I agree that something should be done about Medicare. That said, you must know that I am third generation in the insurance business.
Most people don’t know that the insurance commissioner in their state is an appointment. Usually someone who is owed a favor by the newly elected Governor of the State. They almost never have any experience in the industry. They should.
Every time there is an increase in premiums within a state, it is approved by the commissioner. Do you get it??? If there ever were a reason for an expert in the business this is it.
Rates go up and up. Courts listen to junk cases brought by ambulance chasing lawyers and give large settlements.
When I first got married, a physical cost me $25. Now it is my deductible.
The reasons are easy. Within the system pharmaceutical companies have us paying for all their research and development by charging us huge amounts that other countries they sell to, don’t. There is rampant fraud everywhere, it seems.
Medicare needs to be privatized. Government never, and I mean never, ran anything successfully. Fraud and overcharging needs to be stopped.
Everyone needs to be under the same plan with no exceptions. And that includes government workers, teachers, railroad workers, anyone else that is excluded, and the House and Senate.
Then watch them clean it up.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x