Abortion / Government Watch / Instagram / Opinion / Politics

Democrats Are Terrified to Talk About Abortion

AMAC Exclusive – By Shane Harris

abortion

The prevailing media narrative surrounding the leaking of a draft Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade has been that Democrats focusing in on the abortion issue ahead of the midterms will energize the progressive base, turn moderates against Republicans, and stave off electoral disaster in November. But while the liberal outrage machine has certainly shifted into overdrive the past two weeks, elected Democrats and pro-abortion advocates have resorted to a now-familiar pattern of deflection and distraction to avoid talking about the issue of abortion itself. Much like they have with other divisive issues like pushing Critical Race Theory and gender ideology in schools, the left has created an entirely new vocabulary of benign-sounding words and phrases in a desperate attempt to mask the radical nature of their policies.

This phenomenon was on full display just hours after Politico published the leaked Supreme Court ruling in its entirety, as we began hearing the familiar accusations that overturning Roe amounts to a “violation of women’s rights” and “threatens access to health care.”

Both of these claims attempt to skirt the issue of abortion entirely and allow Democrats to turn the debate into one over noncontroversial ideas like women’s rights and health care rather than talking about the actual issue at hand – namely, whether or not society should condone the elective killing of unborn children in the womb, and whether such an act is a right protected under the Constitution or subject to regulation by each state consistent with the wishes of its voters.

The idea that abortion outside of rare cases where the mother’s life is at stake should be considered “health care” is absurd on its face, as abortion, by definition, involves not the taking of someone’s health but the taking of someone’s life. Moreover, abortion often causes lasting emotional and physical damage to the health of the once expectant mother. While abortion advocates are quick to invoke “women’s rights,” they fail to explain why a woman’s right to not give birth to a child they had a role in conceiving outweighs an unborn baby’s right to be born—a baby who had no role in his or her own conception.

Even the very label of “pro-choice” is an example of Democrats’ unwillingness to talk about their actual position on abortion. As the leftist mobs gathered outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices chant “my body, my choice,” nowhere is there any compassion or sympathy for the hundreds of thousands of unborn babies killed every year who don’t have a voice to defend their right to life. The simple truth is that it is not just a woman’s body that is at issue when it comes to abortion – it is also the body of the innocent life growing inside them.

Democrats have made every effort to change the subject to anything but abortion following the leak of the Supreme Court decision. In a speech to a pro-abortion group last week, Vice President Kamala Harris argued that overturning Roe “will be a direct assault on freedom — on the fundamental right of self-determination to which all Americans are entitled.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was more specific in an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation earlier this week, asking, “What’s next? Marriage equality? What’s next, contraception?” without providing any evidence that the Court is in any way looking to review Supreme Court precedents on either subject. Even more preposterously, Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell insisted that overturning Roe means conservatives “want to ban interracial marriage,” apparently forgetting that one of the Justices who signed on to the decision overturning Roe, Clarence Thomas, is in an interracial marriage.

Another big talking point employed by the left on abortion is that most Americans support keeping Roe in place. But this argument is again a shallow attempt to distract from the reality of the matter and willfully ignores several key facts.

First, there is at least some reason to believe that most Americans who say they support Roe aren’t fully aware of what that statement even means. For the better part of five decades, the liberal media has engaged in a full-on disinformation campaign to convince the country that overturning Roe would mean an immediate blanket ban on abortion in all 50 states. The simple fact of the matter is that, for the most ardent abortion supporters (heavily concentrated in liberal states), nothing will change, and abortion up until the moment of birth will still be legal. Overturning Roe simply means that the states will once again be allowed to decide how they want to regulate abortion without interference from the Supreme Court, as was the case for nearly 200 years before Roe.

Second, whether or not most Americans support Roe is completely irrelevant as a matter of law and thus is not a valid argument for keeping Roe in place. While Supreme Court Justices are nominated and confirmed by the political branches, they serve for life precisely because the Founders wished to insulate the institution of the Court from ever-shifting popular opinion. Even if a large majority of Americans suddenly supported sweeping restrictions on free speech, a Supreme Court decision proscribing free speech would not suddenly become correct as a matter of law. In overturning Roe, the Court would be asserting that the 1973 decision was wrongly decided according to the Constitution, not that the decision itself was good or bad policy.

NPR, which, as a reminder, is funded by taxpayer dollars, was also quick to join in pushing misleading narratives by publishing an article entitled “7 persistent claims about abortion, fact-checked.” Among the “myths” the piece claims to “debunk” is the line that “people are getting abortions late in pregnancy.” As “evidence” that this is untrue, the article cites data showing that 90% of abortions occur in the first trimester. But this still means that 10% of abortions occur after the first trimester. According to CDC data, nearly 36,000 abortions occurred in week 13 of pregnancy or later in 2019, a figure that includes 4,882 abortions after 21 weeks, the generally accepted date for when a child has a chance of surviving outside the womb.

So, clearly, tens of thousands of people are getting abortions late in pregnancy. Moreover, this supposed “debunking” again doesn’t even make an attempt to engage with the central conservative argument that no matter when an abortion occurs, it involves terminating an innocent human life. The rest of the article proceeds in similar fashion, tearing down straw men while failing to provide any solid refutation of conservative arguments on abortion.

The left’s purpose in doing all of this is clear: As with every progressive policy, the American people would be horrified if they knew the truth about the radical abortion agenda supported by the vast majority of elected Democrats today. The country got a glimpse into that ugly reality last month when the remains of fully-formed third-trimester aborted babies were recovered at a house in Washington, D.C. Despite the fact that it appeared some of the infants could have been born alive as a result of late-term abortion and then killed, D.C. law enforcement did not conduct an investigation and said all the abortions were performed legally.

In truth, it may turn out that, contrary to the hopes of Democratic strategists and media pundits, it is conservatives who will be energized by the Court overturning Roe. Unlike the left, conservatives are unafraid to engage with abortion head-on, confident that, no matter what polling or the Supreme Court may say, fighting for the right to life for the unborn will always be the morally righteous thing to do. That type of energy is infectious and has the potential to inspire a wave of pro-life Americans to turn out at the polls and elect legislators who will do the same.

Shane Harris is a writer and political consultant from Southwest Ohio. You can follow him on Twitter at @Shane_Harris_


While you’re here, we have a small favor to ask…

Support Breath of Life Center Inc, an AMAC sponsored 501 (C)(3) charity. We believe in the sanctity of human life and wish to help women through education, support, and direction. Help us in our effort to “be a voice for the voiceless”!

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!


Subscribe
Notify of
131 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert
29 days ago

Abortion is such a divisive issue and a devastating action! It is beneficial for a pregnant woman and ideally the man who fertilized her to proceed to the birth of the infant and to nurture and love the newborn. In America the U.S. Constitution protects the woman from being forced to terminate the delivery of the fetus (unlike China, etc) to birth. Under the same Natural Right of Liberty, the woman may choose to not deliver her fetus to the newborn infant. Abortion is not “killing” a baby! It is terminating the POTENTIAL life of a newborn baby. That is horrendous, often a life altering decision. Of course, no one should pay for another person’s abortion or be forced to support the act. But nobody has the authority to usurp the Constitution (Natural Rights) because of their religious beliefs or what the majority of their State citizens desire. If you want to know the difference between a potential life and an individual newborn baby, ask me, or better yet ask yourself and seriously think about it. Quit dividing this Nation with this ultra difficult emotional issue!

Marie Langley
1 month ago

Another thing that hasn’t been discussed is Planned Parenthood gives away FREE birth control to low income women or at least they used to. We the taxpayers pay for that. There is no excuse for getting pregnant except for rape in my opinion. Go get the FREE birth control so abortion is not an issue! Why hasn’t this been talked about anywhere? I don’t understand.

Marie Langley
1 month ago

The federal government needs to stay out of people’s business!!!!! Let the states decide. The feds are just trying to control every part of our life.
RED=REMOVE EVERY DEMOCRAT

Tom
1 month ago

It’s simple. Democrats believe in death, Republicans in life.

Hal
1 month ago

I still believe the individual states should apply and enforce abortion laws,,, not the Federal level. There are definitely situations where abortion can be a valid choice, and I’m confident the individual state voting citizens can make a reasonable Constitutional set of laws to apply to their individual states. Years ago the state of Texas had a pretty reasonable set of abortion laws that a huge majority of Texas citizens were content with. But the Commie DemocRats want to control that level of governance as part of its subtle dictatorship of the Populus.

Johnathan Galt
1 month ago

I’ve always thought that a ban on abortion was a losing strategy for Republicans. Most women who seek abortions are Democrats, keeping their numbers down. As some famous once said, “Never interrupt the enemy when they are making a mistake.”

Capelady
1 month ago

Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood as a eugenicist who wanted to rid America of undesirables, especially blacks. William Gates Sr. helped to fund Planned Parenthood and served on their board. This is all part of the globalist agenda to depopulate the world and reduce the global population from 7 billion to 500 million. That’s a lot of innocent people they want dead.

The Satanic Temple is trying to protect Roe v Wade under the religious protections of the 1st Amendment because of their belief in ritual sacrifices, especially of the unborn.

Anyone who can’t see the evil forces that are behind all of this are severely lacking in spiritual discernment.

Trump haters are going to hate – most of them are ignorant of his incredible record of accomplishments in less than three years and in face of unprecedented attacks and obstruction – but President Trump is the first President with the courage to participate in the March for Life – even Reagan didn’t do that… and he made ending child sex trafficking a priority of his administration and nobody has done more! Let’s give credit where credit is due!

charliehorse
1 month ago

Black Americans represent 13% of the US population, so near 7% could be considered female. Childbearing ages 15 to 40 would encompass about 1/2 of that 7%, so 3-4% of the US population are black females of childbearing ages.

That 3 or 4% receive over 40% of all the abortions provided in the US often at taxpayer’s expense.
Read that again and let it sink in. Do BLM?

charliehorse
1 month ago

With “Planned Parenthood” clinics conveniently located in minority neighborhoods, the statistical reality of the percentage of abortions in the minority population should be no surprise.

Henker
1 month ago

Industrial Abortion is the absolute manifestation of Evil and the Democrats are its agents and operatives. The Democrat machine is the servant of the Unholy.

cupera1
1 month ago

Missing in the story is the money side of the abortion story. Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of the babies they abort and they make a lot of money from those sales. “I can get a Lamborghini now” was a quote from a PP representative when she was drooling about all the money she would make in commissions for the baby parts sales. One whistle blower in the Dallas facility told investigators that the facility clears $100,000 to $120,000 a month on baby part sales alone. On October 13, 2015 Planned Parenthood announced that they would no longer be accepting payments for “tissue samples/baby parts”. That policy lasted just a few months. There are nearly 100 PP facility of similar size across the country. Using the low number that is $120,000,000 to PP bottom line per year, for that amount of money Democrat politicians and left wing journalist would say and do anything to keep the chop shop open.

Frank
1 month ago

Remember: The prochoice want you to focus on the 3% of abortions that are due to rape, incest, to save the life of the mother or the child is not viable. 

They don’t want you to focus on the 95-97% of abortions that are for reasons of comfort and convenience.

Change the focus to where it belongs…the 95-97%!

cupera1
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank

The four reasons the liberals get an abortion: I want shiny new thing not a baby, wrong sex, wrong color or that baby bump turns off the cute guy I want to have cheap and meaningless sex with. Democrats see babies just like they see black slaves, a lower life form that is not a human being but a piece of property.

Skeptic JR
1 month ago

Like most Americans, I don’t think abortion is entirely a black and white issue, but clearly the “woman’s rights” should be outweighed by the baby as soon as there’s any chance the baby can feel any pain from the procedure – which is about 12 weeks. During the short window of time that it is unaware and cannot feel, there can be leniency. But I find all later abortion arguments (other that those for actual health and preservation of life) to be spurious.
Disability abortions are evil. Aren’t these the same people who advocate that disabled people are people too? They keep extending the range of what is called disability. Me and my son have extremely mild autism, according to some doctors. We have college educations and careers. Some of these people would have amnio to look for our “bad genes” and have us killed. What about the tests that are wrong and have mothers about to abort perfectly healthy babies? That happens too.
I find it ironic the same kind of people who will cry or be outraged over the idea of kicking a puppy or hurting a kitten will agitate for the right of a woman to rip apart a 4 month old fetus or greater – a human child who is almost certainly writhing in agony the entire time – simply because she “is depressed” or “the baby was a product of rape or incest”. In case one, seek psychiatric help, in case two, give it up if you can’t stand to look at it once it’s born. You don’t get to torture a child to death because you’re unhappy.
And it is a child. Pro-choice advocates will constantly say “it isn’t a baby” or “it isn’t a human”. This is a bad argument that makes them look either stupid or malicious. What they are truly trying to do is psychologically distance themselves from the outcome of their political stance. Even the early developing embryo is a tiny baby – but most people feel lenient at this stage since pregnancy is so uncertain then anyway, since she isn’t visibly pregnant, and since the fetus at early stages is so small and barely resembles a person. It’s easy to give it a pass, and most of us do.
But something has to be wrong with you, psychologically, to excuse later abortions, where everyone knows it’s just a small, delicate baby in there who simply lacks the size needed to exist outside of it’s mother.

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  Skeptic JR

“Unless and until it can be proven that an unborn child is not a human being, can we justify assuming without proof that it isn’t? No one has yet offered such proof; indeed, all the evidence is to the contrary.

We should rise above bitterness and reproach, and if Americans could come together in a spirit of understanding and helping, then we could find positive solutions to the tragedy of abortion.“ — Ronald Reagan

James Huguenot
1 month ago

In 2020, for the first time, since 1964, I refused to vote gop. WHY??? When trump forced barrett {a radical, rabid, bible thumper} onto the SCUTUS, I knew he was packing the court, in order to overturn Roe V Wade. Not only do the anti abortion nazis want to outlaw ALL abortions {even from rape and/or incest} they want to make contraceptives unavailable.
Many, if not most, US citizens are too young to remember the MANY deaths from desperate women getting unsafe, illegal abortions, even at the cost of their lives.
My father threw me out because I bought a car that he did not pick out for me. When my 18 year old brother {of LEGAL drinking age, at the time} came home drunk one night, the old man beat him so bad, he had to be taken to the hospital. Not only was he EXTREMELY controlling, he had a violent temper. I hate to think what he would have done to either of my sisters, had they gotten pregnant– murder would not be surprising.

How many of those “saved” babies have YOU anti abortion Nazis taken into YOUR homes to raise as your own? Including feeding, education, clothing, medical, and EVERYTHING involved in raising a child to adulthood, Instead of ignoring that baby once it leaves the womb?
How many? None? Then YOU HYPOCRITES need to shut up.

Kevin
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

I am one of those children saved from abortion. I was adopted and raised to believe in the sanctity of LIFE,and you are a blabbering moron.

Jay David
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Thank you for that thoughful, sober examination of abortion in society. Now I know where I can find a cup of arsenic.

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Conservative groups have been at the forefront of US efforts to support, house, encourage and counsel women who have found themselves pregnant and considering abortion. They are also by far the largest group of people in the US who have supported adoption options, Christian adoption agencies and even adopted unwanted infants themselves into their own families. Amy Coney Barrett herself has 5 natural kids and two adopted.

And if there were not so many financial, legal and social ROADBLOCKS to adopting an American baby, many more of them would be adopted by loving conservative families.
There are 200,000+ couples in the US hoping to adopt a child at any point in time, but find artificial barriers such as being targeted by social “justice” advocates who oppose a white family adopting black babies or Christian adoption agencies forced to place children with homosexual couples against their beliefs.
______
Perhaps the question you SHOULD be asking is how many illegals, which the LEFT is now forcing upon this nation by the hundreds of thousands, by refusing to secure our borders, are THOSE ON THE LEFT taking in to fully care for, support, provide for medical and social care, educate and coddle till they can make it on their own? I would venture to guess: NONE, unless they can profit from it with huge government contracts and payouts.

Johnathan Galt
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

So, you are in favor of SCOTUS unconstitutionally legislating from the bench? Roe was unconstitutional – Ginsberg and many, many other Democrat Constitutional scholars all said so. Democrats had fifty years, some with a super majority, to pass one simple law clarifying the Constitution which could have fit on a post card:

“A child inside the womb shall not be considered a “person” under our Constitution until it has reached the age of (“X”) weeks after conception.”

That’s all. They could have additionally submitted a proposed Amendment for ratification. If it isn’t a person, the child has no protection under the law and the mother may do what she wishes.

If you are angry at Republicans for upholding the Constitution, then you were never a Conservative.

Clark Kent
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

SMILE! Your mom was pro-life!

Rich C
1 month ago

When a person violates one of God’s laws, there is a haunting feeling inside even though they have convinced themselves otherwise. Abortion is the elimination of a human being. Plane and simple. The radical left thinks they have nothing to answer to since they are their own “god”. Many now worship the creation, not the creator. There is always forgiveness for an abortion and in rare cases it may be justified. To just murder a baby because you don’t want the responsibility is just wrong. There are many young couples waiting sometimes years for an adoption and would love to have a new born baby.

Robert Zuccaro
1 month ago

I watched a video in the mid-90’s that showed how a late term abortion is performed. Gruesome. I believe any abortion is but can live with a compromise of 15 weeks. There are about 6 countries that have unrestricted abortion… all THIRD WORLD (not counting China). Even Europe has restrictions! Obamacare pays for birth control… easy way to end abortion. USE IT! Ask your Democrat lawmaker why they shot down a bill making BC over the counter. But that would cut into Planned Parenthood cash flow and DNC fundraising payola, hm?

James Huguenot
1 month ago
Reply to  Robert Zuccaro

Planned Parenthood DOES NOT use any federal monies for abortions!!!!!
Those are paid for with donations {like my regular donations}.
The gop anti abortion Nazis that want to completely defund PP are too stupid to realize that PP performs MANY, MANY services unavailable to un/under insured women AND MEN, such as cancer screenings, STD testing, contraceptives and how to use them, etc.,etc.

TTanin
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

James,
Have you ever heard of accounting? Federal money not spent on abortions is spent on those other services, thereby freeing up other money for abortions

Johnathan Galt
1 month ago
Reply to  TTanin

Precisely. Fine restaurants do not profit from the food – they use the fine food to attract people who consume extremely profitable adult beverages. It is exactly the same scenario with clinics – profits from government funded other services subsidize abortion.

Jay
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Money is fungible. You must be a Democrat.

Johnathan Galt
1 month ago
Reply to  Jay

To grasp the fundamentals of economics, you must first grasp basic math. Every Democrat who ever learned both immediately left the Democrat party.

Johnathan Galt
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Planned Parenthood DOES NOT use any federal monies for abortions!!!!!”

That’s like saying restaurants don’t use profits from the bar to subsidize a good chef. Every good restaurant in existence does so.

Find me an honest person, and I’ll at least know they aren’t a Democrat.

Philip Hammersley
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Of course, THEY DO! Money is fungible! PP (Murder, Inc.) gets $1.5 million a day and claims it doesn’t fund abortions. PP does ZERO tests, just gives referrals. Their CEO and leaders get huge (blood money) salaries. They set up mostly in black neighborhoods because Margaret Sanger, racist friend of the KKK, wanted to “eliminate human weeds” (AKA Negroes, Southern Europeans, Catholics, Jews).
On the other hand, Pregnancy Care centers receive ZERO tax dollars yet provide multiple FREE tests, baby supplies, and counseling! Their employees work for FREE.

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  Robert Zuccaro

Please, think again about your spirit of “compromise”. Does it look, at ALL, like the Left wants compromise on this issue? Pushing it to the States is the only “compromise” we can justify at present, it seems. There, it will be left up to the voters (not the legislators or judges). It will be interesting to see what comes of that in States where there are currently very lenient (up to the moment of birth) laws.

“Unless and until it can be proven that an unborn child is not a human being, can we justify assuming without proof that it isn’t? No one has yet offered such proof; indeed, all the evidence is to the contrary.
“We should rise above bitterness and reproach, and if Americans could come together in a spirit of understanding and helping, then we could find positive solutions to the tragedy of abortion.“ — Ronald Reagan

Johnathan Galt
1 month ago
Reply to  ML Standifer

Democrats have been shouting for years that “our Democracy is at risk!,” then are shocked and angry when it works just as intended.

Mickey the Smickey
1 month ago

I suppose the “Dummycratic Party DOES NOT understand what the 5th Commandment of God is! ALL lives are SACRED in the eyes of God!

James Huguenot
1 month ago

Just why the hell do you feel the need to FORCE your BS religion down my throat????

ALL religions are an abomination to ALL people.
Religion has been a scam for controlling the gullible masses since before recorded history.
Religion, just like drugs and booze, is a crutch for those too weak to face life on their own.

Jay
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

So, the key to it being OK to whack the unborn is not have any higher power? Gee, I thought the only requirement for not knowing killing another human was wrong was merely to be human. What other things are you OK with. Lying, cheating, stealing? What a sad and conflicted person you must be.

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Whatever is fueling your outrage and irrational excuses for supporting abortion, seems to be the crutch YOU are using, since you are unable to face the fact that life, HUMAN life— is the topic here, not religion.

You on the LEFT want the “CONTROL”, and when your “gullible masses” see things differently, you react with rage instead of rational argument.

If I could see your face, I would be able to tell with certainty, but will just assume from your multiple posts here and your intolerance to any argument to the contrary, that you have your father’s eyes. The eyes of the FATHER OF LIES.

Kevin Driscoll
1 month ago

Read the articled about the DC abortions. Nowhere in the article did it claim the fetuses were late term. Where did that information come from and how can I find it?

James Huguenot
1 month ago
Reply to  Kevin Driscoll

Kevin Driscoll:
One has to keep in mind that, to the anti abortion Nazis, the truth is a hindrance to their agenda.

Philip Hammersley
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

NAZIs favor DEATH; that’s YOUR side!

Jay
1 month ago
Reply to  Kevin Driscoll

I found this, looks like the Democrat leadership in DC didn’t want to know how far along these babies were: washingtonpost.com/religion/2022/04/01/lauren-handy-dc-abortion-fetuses/

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  Kevin Driscoll

Decide for yourself: “ Shocking Images Show 5 Babies Killed in Late-Term Abortions at D.C. Abortion Clinic” —lifenew.com

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  ML Standifer

That’s “lifenews”.

William C Smith
1 month ago

Best contraceptive device is an aspirin—held tightly between the ladies’ knees when the urge to have consensual illicit sexual relations arise, until they disspipate. No unwanted, unplanned pregnancies, no abortions.

James Huguenot
1 month ago

William c smith:
Have you ever heard the term RAPE? Or INCESTUAL RAPE???

Obviously, you didn’t read the article, right here on msn, about a nine year old girl, pregnant by rape by a family member {I think it was Brazil– before abortion was legalized there} That was FORCED TO CARRY TO TERM.
Do you want that to be the norm in the US???

ML Standifer
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Wow, thanks for that “norm” you just pulled out of the air. Majoring in minors is the “go-to” for you in the abortion debate, even if you have to use a situation in another COUNTRY to do so!

Exactly the point made in the article above; you on the LEFT have to bring out the most rare and least likely scenarios in order to viciously defend the indefensible.

You can’t just have a civil conversation about the concept that an unborn child is HUMAN from conception.

“Unless and until it can be proven that an unborn child is not a human being, can we justify assuming without proof that it isn’t? No one has yet offered such proof; indeed, all the evidence is to the contrary.” — Ronald Reagan

Casey C Matt
1 month ago

There should be rare exceptions to banning of abortions. Take Joe Bidens and Kamela Harris and even Nancy Pelosi parents…..think if they had coat hangered their eventual……child
Maybe Democrat parents should have abortion mandated. If these three had removed “tissue”, then the entirety of the globe would be much better off.

Mike
1 month ago
Reply to  Casey C Matt

No abortion ever for any reason. It is murder. God alone is the giver and taker of life. Unfortunately our society has become immoral. Sex outside of marriage is always wrong and always brings bad things, like becoming morally corrupt and abortion and homosexuality. God’s word should always be our guide. We need to become a Godly country again or we will be no more.

James Huguenot
1 month ago
Reply to  Mike

YOUR god, not mine.

ALL religions are an abomination to ALL people.
Religion has been a scam for controlling the gullible masses since before recorded history.
Religion, just like drugs and booze, is a crutch for those too weak to face life on their own.

Frank
1 month ago
Reply to  James Huguenot

Oh stop embarrassing yourself

Philip Hammersley
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank

He probably works for atheist George Soros who pays for death!

131
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x