Advocacy / Politics

AMAC Signs Coalition Letter To Protect Medical Testing For Seniors

FISA spying Clinton funded dossier seniors medical testingGroups ask Congress to compel HHS to follow congressional mandate

ALEXANDRIA,Virginia – A coalition of free market organizations is asking Congress to compel the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to abide by legislation regarding free-market medical laboratory test payments involving Medicare recipients.

In a letter to key congressional leaders, the coalition, led by the 60 Plus Association, requests that Congress take action to ensure that HHS abide by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA), and direct the agency to transition to a market-based payment model for laboratory testing as required by law.

“Unfortunately, HHS chose to disregard Congress’ intent and, instead, use its bureaucratic power to cherry-pick data from fewer than 1% of laboratories. This, in turn, produced the foreordained outcome of greatly reduced reimbursement for laboratory tests and diagnostics,” notes the letter, which was signed by leaders from 17 free market public policy groups.

The coalition praises Congress for having done, “the right thing in directing HHS to develop market based rates,” but asks that Congress, “ensure that HHS follows the law and stops abusing its authority. We ask that you direct HHS to follow the law as written and develop methodology that appropriately captures the full marketplace.”
“This is a key cost driver for millions of seniors who need speedy, affordable medical laboratory access to ensure their quality of health care,” said Jim Martin, chairman and founder of the 60 Plus Association. “Congress did its part in passing the Protecting Access to Medicare Act. Now, Congress needs to make sure the Department of Health and Human Services does its job by implementing the law in a manner that protects seniors though the free market principles of PAMA.”

Click Here to Read Letter

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 years ago

Thanks AMAC for being a great sounding board. Along with this topic, I would like to add that we should ALL vehemently oppose
the Dems move to “Medicare for All” which is just another deceptively mislabeled social program. This move, as with all social engineering
efforts, is just another effort to describe excrement as a cinnamon bun. “Medicare for All” will eliminate our Supplement options ( I have plan F) and will cost enough to run at least 10 nations. It moves current Medicare expenses away from seniors to purchase minimal insurance for non-seniors. It is a SINGLE PAYER……SINGLE PAYER…..SINGLE PAYER program. Single payer is an acronym for doom. Then, it moves into a monstrous cost buildup which is about $31B…B…B…illion per year. Don’t get sucked into this. If you must take an ambulance,
please VOTE in November to defeat this party of Communist incompetents. If they win this year, they will nominate Putin in 2020.

4 years ago

Thank you for sharing this useful information, I will regularly follow your blog

4 years ago

Medicare needs constant oversight by legal medical financial accounting and given sway by voice in fed budgeting…letting government be the only reliable means of assessment is a major mistake….less gov the better….

4 years ago

Well I really enjoyed reading it. This information procured by you is very practical for correct planning. bddaacbdbcdkdeeb

4 years ago

Medicare increases can only be controlled through efficiency which means awarding business to those firms that can provide the required services at an optimal cost. Laboratory and Diagnostic services being subject to this makes sense since it doesn’t deny the patient choice in primary care or specialist doctors. 60 Plus is simply incorrect to oppose this initiative by Medicare.

4 years ago
Reply to  wolverine70

That is great for Utilitarian thinking but does not respect our rights as written in law.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x